Noctis Draven, a self-described combat veteran, writer, and historical researcher, projects an image of complexity and moral ambiguity, but his silence and evasion on crucial issues like terrorism reveal a far more troubling side. Draven, known for his podcast The Grey, which pushes the idea that “nothing is black & white,” may appeal to those looking for depth in political discourse. However, this very philosophy is what allows him to dangerously tiptoe around condemning acts of terror, including the heinous massacre carried out by Hamas on October 7, 2023.

Despite his anti-war posturing, Draven has consistently failed to explicitly denounce Hamas, a terrorist organization responsible for the murder of over 1,200 civilians during the October 7 attacks, including women, children, and the elderly. By embracing a narrative of moral grey areas, Draven dangerously blurs the lines between legitimate resistance and outright terrorism. This moral relativism serves only one purpose: to provide cover for violent extremists.

Anyone who chooses to engage with Draven’s content, whether through his writings or his podcast, should be aware of what he’s really advocating for when he avoids outright condemnation of groups like Hamas. His reluctance to speak out against terrorism is not a mark of nuance—it’s a clear sign of where his sympathies lie. In today’s world, those who refuse to denounce terror are, in effect, complicit in it.

The truth is simple: anyone who legitimizes or excuses violence against civilians is standing with the terrorists, not with the victims. Draven’s failure to take a clear stance against groups like Hamas exposes him for what he truly is—a sympathizer hiding behind rhetoric.